|
Why ISO15693?
-
For use over distances of up to 1 meter or 3 ft
-
Less maintenance
-
No battery inside
-
No wear/tear
-
Small integrated circuit inside with on board storage space
-
Can host multiple applications
-
Secure data transfer
ISO15693 vs. ISO14443:
-
ISO15693 has 1 meter (~3 ft) read range vs. 10 cm (~4")
-
Although ISO14443 reads 4 times faster than ISO15693, this throughput feature
is not a deciding factor. Because, there is only a small amount of data is
transferred.
-
ISO15693 costs less since it serves as the foundation for a variety of
applications such as airline baggage tracking and SCM.
|
ISO15693 vs. MIFARE:
-
Mifare is not a standard. It is a brand name.
-
ISO15693 costs and will cost less than MIFARE, since economies of scale.
-
ISO15693 has 5 times read range than MIFARE has.
-
ISO15693 has 64-bit key, where as MIFARE has 48-bit key.
-
ISO15693 matches the security feature of Mifare with the protected
Tag-IT HF-I PRO transponder In-Lays.
|